Herbert W. Simons
Emeritus Professor of Communication, Temple University
HOME VITA SELECTED WRITINGS MORE WRITINGS COURSE MATERIALS GUEST LECTURING MEDIA COMMENTARY EDUCATIONAL CONSULTING DIRECTOR, NCA FORUM LINKS
 

Abstract

On November 9, 1993, Vice-President Al Gore debated Ross Perot on the subject of NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement. That Gore triumphed in the debate and succeeded thereby in winning pivotal votes in Congress for NAFTA has been widely acknowledged by the news media. The argument of this essay is that the debaters' character displays, presented in a context that made them exceptionally salient, were sufficient to prompt a reasonable message recipient to judge not just the debate but the policy proposal being debated.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter

Abstract

Introduction

Rhetorical Rationality

Rhetorical Rationality in the Gore-Perot Debate

Conclusion

References
SELECTED WRITINGS
A Dilemma-Centered Analysis of Clinton's August 17th Apologia: Implications for Rhetorical Theory and Method

Judging A Policy Proposal By the Company It Keeps: The Gore-Perot NAFTA Debate

Rhetoric of Inquiry as an Intellectual Movement

Arguing About the Ethos of Past Actions: An Analysis of a Taped Conversation About a Taped Conversation

Burke, Marx, and Warrantable Outrage

Rhetorical Hermeneutics and the Project of Globalization

Media & Politics

The Rhetorical Construction of Institutional Fact: An Analysis of Social Problems Discourse

Temple Issues Forum: Innovations in Pedagogy

The Rhetoric of Philosophical Incommensurability

Rhetoric of the Classroom Teacher

Going Meta

The RPS Approach

Social Movements