Dialogue
& Community |
|
| |
|
![]() |
Leonard
Swidler
I was born the year of the Great Crash (1929)--I hope it was not post hoc, ergo propter hoc!-- and hence grew up during the Great Depression. I was in high school during the Second World War (Central Catholic in Green Bay, WI), and just missed the latter (I was sixteen when the war ended). I was a member of a tiny minority in an ocean of ex-GI's in St. Norbert's College (De Pere, WI, 1946-50), which is also why I did not make the first team of St. Norbert's unbeaten football team, even though I had made "All State" in my senior year in high school. After finishing a BA in history and philosophy I joined the Norbertine religious order (founded in the 12th century), but after two years of study was put out because I was "too pious"-don't laugh! I studied theology two more years in a diocesan seminary, but left without being ordained, having realized that I wanted the academic, not pastoral, life. I then did an MA at Marquette University (Milwaukee, 1954-55) in history, philosophy and literature, and worked on a Ph.D. at the University of Wisconsin in the same areas (1955-57). In searching for a doctoral dissertation topic, I made the life-shaping choice to work on the "Una Sancta Movement," a movement of rapprochement between Catholics and Protestants in Germany starting post-World War I and exploding after World War II. Having married Arlene Anderson in 1957, I went to Germany to do research and while at the University of Tübingen (where our first daughter was born in the Frauenklinik) I also arranged to earn a degree (1959) in Catholic Theology (Sacrae Theologiae Licentiatus -- STL) from the Pontifical Catholic Theology Faculty, the first Catholic layperson to earn a degree in Catholic theology; today, of course, there are thousands of laypersons with Catholic theology degrees. We returned to the US in 1960, to teach at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh, where Arlene noted that there was no periodical in America devoted to ecumenism -- and so, in 1963 we launched the Journal of Ecumenical Studies (JES), a scholarly quarterly devoted to dialogue, first intra-Christian, then inter-religious and finally inter-ideological (the core of the latter being Christian-Marxist dialogue). Since 1966 I have been on the faculty of Temple University's Religion Department. In addition I have served as visiting professor at Graz (Austria), Hamburg and Tübingen, Nankai University (Tianjin, People's Republic of China), Fudan University (Shanghai, China), and Temple University Japan (Tokyo). In 1978, I established the Institute for Interreligious, Intercultural Dialogue as an outreach arm of JES, which in the past twenty years has sponsored scores of lectures, conferences, seminars, books and more. Then in 1995, together with Ashok Gangedean, and others, I started the Global Dialogue Institute (GDI), which now is poised to bring my previous dialogue work, and that of Ashok, to a new global level, reaching out and linking the creativity generated in interreligious, intercultural dialogue to the opinion-shaping groups of world society -- business, education, law, communications, the arts, and others. We look forward in this work of Deep-Dialogue to the collaboration of all those who in any way are connected with GDI, or are touched by it. Len and Arlene Swidler's Resume can be visited at http://blue.temple.edu/~dialogue
GDI's vision has been implicit in Harry's own vision for doing business. His oil refining business is one of the few pursuing environmental goals to use wind and other sources of renewable energy. Simultaneously with oil refining, he formed Energy Unlimited, Inc. for wind and other affiliated corporations converting biomass to biochemicals to replace petro chemicals. He is involved in some solar energy, but wind is more commercially viable, moving faster, and more competitive in much of the world. Harry serves on the boards of several academic institutions: the University of Pennsylvania Engineering School, The College of Commerce and Finance, Villanova University, the Shipley School, and the Academy of Natural Sciences. He is also a founding trustee of The Enlightened World Foundation, whose aim is to encourage for profit corporations and other institutions in solving the world's problems through goods and services. This organization is beginning to define socially responsible corporations and rate them on their impact on their employees and society as a whole. Has Harry tried to introduce the notion of Deep-Dialogue into his own workplace? In response to this question, Harry emphasizes that since the technology of Deep-Dialogue is still taking shape, teaching it to his employees has been premature. Nevertheless, dialogue is beginning to enter into business thinking and process. In fact, Harry is planning a workshop for his senior executives using GDI's materials as a tool to facilitate international dialogue. If in the public's consciousness business leaders are perceived as solely concerned with the bottom line of profit, Harry Halloran clearly shatters the stereotype. For Harry, the vision of his company is primary and profits secondary. Moreover, He believes that stereotype of CEO's is naive because he is not alone. Out of his vision there is room for softer values than the bottom line. Awakening to dialogue, he argues, is critical to communicating with people in general and in his company. Harry's career and civic path speak to his own awakening They also provide an inspiring and hopeful model for pragmatically blending one's deepest values and ideals with the mundane workaday world. Report on GDI Activities in 1998
|
Ashok
Gangadean
All through my career as a philosopher I have focused on a fundamental problem in the human condition that has persisted through the ages and had never been adequately resolved. We know that we inhabit worlds and live situated in worldviews. We humans inhabit profoundly diverse worlds -- cultural, religious, ideological -- and it is clear that what makes sense in one worldview often does not make sense in another. And yet we have this amazing capacity to encounter and enter alternative worldviews in their own terms, and make sense of reality is very different ways, even as we continue to be centered in our own indigenous worldview. But it has never been adequately explained how it is possible for us to move in all sorts of ways between alternative worlds. The most advanced research east and west had not yet accounted for the laws and dynamics of human intelligence as we move between alternative worldviews. And yet in our cultural evolution over millennia it has become painfully clear that one of the most urgent challenges facing humanity today is the breakdown of communication and human relations between diverse worldviews and perspectives. Our very welfare and survival now turns on our capacity to communicate effectively and relate in nonviolent humane ways with one another across and between worldviews. We know that violence of all sorts erupt when very different worldviews confront one another. And with the intensive globalization that has accelerated in the 20th Century bringing different worlds into increased direct interaction the problems of communicating nonviolently between worldviews is a key to our sustainability. So it was clear to me when I arrived at Haverford College as a beginning professor in l968 that the most important human problem I could focus upon was trying to resolve the complex issues of communication and relations between worlds. Over these three decades I followed the intuition that there must be a profound unifying principle and common ground between diverse worldviews. As I expanded my explorations into the foundations of consciousness into diverse eastern traditions of meditative thought I began to find hidden patterns and global trends in the evolution of cultures that I could not see before. As my inquiry rose to a higher global perspective across and between alternative cultural and religious traditions it became clear that humanity has been in a deep and painful evolutionary transformation from egocentric "minding" to a more mature reality oriented pattern of dialogic living. Over three decades this journey into the depths of the emergence of the dialogical revolution in the human condition reached a culmination in the publication of my twin volumes -- Meditative Reason: Toward Universal Grammar and Between Worlds: The Emergence of Global Reason. In these two volumes I attempt to clarify the missing fundamental Logos or Primal Unifying Power out of which diverse worlds are generated and held in mutual interaction. This fundamental Logos is at once the source of the formation of alternative worlds and also of the relations between worlds. This Logos is the generative principle that makes communication possible between very different worlds. And it is at the core of what Len Swidler and I now call Deep-Dialogue. The dynamics of Deep-Dialogue is a technology of living that transforms all aspects of our personal and corporate lives. And the Global Dialogue Institute (GDI) seeks to awaken the deep dialogical transformation in all aspects of our cultural lives. We invite you to join us in this vital and timely work. In 1999, Leonard Swidler and
Ashok Gangadean will join Racelle Weiman and Yael Ben-Ami for for a Deep-Dialogue
project planned for Israel. According to Dr. Weiman, Israel has recently The series of workshops and seminars in Israel will be geared towards:
Dr. Weiman has taught for over
a decade at the University of Haifa, where she specializes in courses on
Interfaith and Inter-ethnic Conflict, and Holocaust and Genocide Studies.
She lectures to professional organizations which include: clergy, police
and military personnel, public administrators and journalists. She serves
as a consultant in Canada for The League for Human Rights and the Commission
on Human Rights.
GDI encourages individuals in professional fields to adopt a dialogic and global perspective. Professor Lynch, a member of the GDI board, hopes his efforts to introduce this set of values into the field of public administration will serve as a model for other professional groups. Along parallel lines, both he and his wife Cynthia presented a paper on spiritual wisdom at an organization theory conference in March, 1998, in Colorado Springs. Their approach links ethical decision making with the spiritual wisdom literature of the major religious traditions. Professor Lynch also presented a practical workshop on this approach to ethical decision making at the 1998 national ASPA conference in May in Seattle. GDI Website
As a service of the Center for Global Ethics, a GDI subsidiary with its own web-page, we are also running an international e-mail discussion forum in the Temple University system. To subscribe, please send the following message (without subject) to: listserv@listserv.temple.edu: subscribe g-ethic your-first-name your-last-name If you have technical questions
concerning the Website or Listserv forum, please contact Ingrid Shafer
(ihs@ionet.net ).
|
Dialogue
& Community is published twice a year by the Global
Dialogue Institute. For membership information contact GDI., 7501 Woodcrest,
Philadelphia, PA 19151. Email: dialogue@vm.temple.edu
or agangade@haverford.edu Web edition copyright © 1998 Ingrid Shafer Posted 18 October 1998 |