| Journal of Ecumenical
Studies, 28:1, Winter 1991
EDITORIAL
TOWARD A
"UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF GLOBAL
ETHOS"*
It is beyond
the borders of sanity that Catholics and Protestants are blowing each other
up in Northern Ireland, that Hindus and Buddhists wantonly massacre each
other in Sri Lanka, that Jews and Muslims teeter on the abyss of war in
the Near East, that Sikhs and Hindus terrorize each other in the Punjab,
that Muslims and Hindus are always in a state of hostile unrest in Kashmir,
that Marxists and Muslims murder each other with abandon in Afghanistan,
that various factions of Christians and Muslims in Lebanon have made
the "Switzerland of the Near East" a roiling charnel house -- and on and
on. Our religions and ideologies must put a stop to these perversions of
Religion and Ideology!
Modern,
purely secular men and women often put religiously committed men and men
to shame in their human love and compassion. Ultimately, however, they
find it difficult to provide a theoretical basis for such positive actions
toward humans. After all, from a strictly rational perspective, just
why should someone extend concern and love toward one's "neighbor"?
Religions,
however, have profound answers to that fundamental ethical question. But,
they must no longer speak in multiple, confusing tongues about it. Nor
can they ignore those modern ideologies that function like religions by
providing an "explanation of the ultimate meaning of life, and an ethics
with which to live accordingly," though their "explanations" are not based
on a notion of the "Transcendent," as are religions'.
A worldwide
dialogue, a global dialogue, must be initiated that will lead to the building
of a consensus on a "Global Ethos." (By "ethos" here is meant the fundamental
attitude toward good and evil and the basic principles to carry that attitude
into action.) Bilateral dialogues between religions and ideologies, vital
as they are, are no longer sufficient for the world of today and tomorrow.
A beginning
has been made, of course, through organizations like the Conference on
Religion and Peace, but the occasional large meeting is far from sufficient.
The situation is much too critical and is becoming increasing so at an
almost geometric rate of acceleration. The world does not have the
luxury of waiting patiently for a Global Ethos! Immediate action
is necessary:
_______________
-
*The
initial inspiration for this statement came from the book by Hans Küng,
Projekt
Weltethos (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1990); E.T.: Global Responsibility.
In Search of a New World Ethic (New York: Crossroad, 1991).
-
Web Editor's Note [not part of the JES editorial]: The term
"Global Ethos" would subsequently be changed to "a Global Ethic" as a "Declaration
Toward a Global Ethic" was drafted by Hans Küng,
translated by Leonard Swidler, and ratified by the Parliament of the World's
Religions in September, 1993.
123
124 Journal of Ecumenical Studies
-
Every major religion and ethical group
needs to commission its expert scholars to focus their research and
reflection on articulating a Global Ethos from the perspective of their
religion or ethical group -- in dialogue with all other religions and ethical
groups.
-
Every religious and ethical scholarly
institution with such experts needs to press them to use their creativity
among themselves and in conjunction with scholars from other religious
and ethical institutions in formulating this a Global Ethos.
-
Interreligious, ethical scholarly "Working
Groups" need to be formed to focus on this issue; existent ones need
to turn their attention thereto.
-
Beyond that there needs to be a major
permanent a Global Ethos Research Center, which will have some of
the best experts from the world's major religions and ethical groups in
residence, perhaps for years at a stretch, pursuing precisely this
topic in its multiple ramifications.
Such efforts
should concentrate on drawing together the research and reflection on a
Global Ethos and related matters into a "Universal Declaration of
Global Ethos," which would then be circulated to the various forums of
all the religions and ethical groups for appropriate revisions -- with
a view to eventual adoption by all the religions and ethical groups of
the world. Such a "Universal Declaration of a Global Ethos" would then
serve a function similar to the 1948 "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
of the United Nations -- a kind of standard that all will be expected to
live up to.
Already,
the various versions of the "Golden Rule" found in many religions and philosophies
provide a starting point for such a "Universal Declaration of a Global
Ethos," which will have to center on care and reverence for all humans
-- and, therefore, be "anthropocentric." But, it will also have to go beyond,
to care and reverence for all reality - and, therefore, really be cosmo-anthropocentric."
The difficult
problem of the differing understandings of and articulations about Ultimate
Reality will also have to be resolved for incorporation in the "Universal
Declaration of Global Ethos" -- otherwise, it will not be completely persuasive
in the various religious and ethical communities.
Such an
undertaking by the religions and ethical groups of the world would be different
from, but complementary to, the work of the United Nations. The U.N. brings
to bear the political force of all the nations of the world on the implementation
of the 1948 "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and subsequent U.N.
documents. The "Universal Declaration a Global Ethic" would in a major
way bring to bear the moral and spiritual resources of all the religions
and ethical groups on the basic ethical problems of the world, which are
not easily susceptible to political force.
Leonard Swidler (Catholic)
Hans Küng (Catholic)
125 Journal of Ecumenical Studies
[The following
"representative sample" of scholars of religion also signed this statement
as it appeared in the Süddeutsche Zeitung (Munich) in German, and
elsewhere:
Mohammad Arkoun (Muslim), Julia Ching
(Confucian/Catholic), John Cobb (.Methodist), Khalid Duran (Muslim), Claude
Geffré (Catholic), Irving Greenberg (Jewish), Norbert Greinacher
(Catholic), Riffat Hassan (Muslim), Rivka Horwitz (Jewish), John Hick (Presbyterian),
Adel Khoury (Catholic), Paul Knitter (Catholic), Karl-Josef Kuschel (Catholic),
Pinchas Lapide (Jewish), Johannes Lähnemann (Lutheran), Dietmar Mieth
(Catholic), Paul Mojzes (Methodist), Jürgen Moltmann (Reformed), Fathi
Osman (Muslim), Raimundo Panikkar (Hindu/Buddhist/Catholic), Daniel Polish
(Jewish), Rodolfo Stavenhagen (sociologist), Theo Sundemeier (Lutheran),
Knut Walf (Catholic/Taoist).
© Journal of Ecumenical Studies 1992
All rights reserved
Journal of Ecumenical Studies
(ISSN 0022-0558)
Temple University (022-38)
Philadelphia, PA 19122
(phone: 215-204-7714)
(fax: 215-204-4569)
email: dialogue@vm.temple.edu
|